As a result of the data transfer, the energy consumption in the data center and the electricity used for the end devices, carbon is emitted every time someone accesses a website.
Our goal is to make the internet a bit more sustainable, so we not only offer relevant statistics where the data is 100% yours, but also contribute with you to a better climate and offset the carbon emissions caused by your website with the help of atmosfair.de.
Of course, offsetting the carbon emissions is not enough, so on this page you will also find tips on how you can additionally reduce the carbon emissions of your website.
What are the advantages of sustainable web design?#
Optimizing your website to cause less data transfer and CO2 emissions provides even more benefits for you:
- User Experience: there is a big connection between sustainable web design and better UX. If a visitor finds his way to his destination faster, he is not only happier and less likely to abandon his intention (e.g. buying a product in your online store), but also less resources are consumed as a result.
- SEO: For search engines, the loading time of a website is becoming increasingly relevant in the evaluation. Efficient websites with smaller amounts of data load faster and thus appear higher up in the search results of major search engines.
- Accessibility: Visitors have different needs. Poor internet connections, old devices, expensive data plans: if your website is optimized and works well and fast for all these groups, you will reach more people.
- Hosting costs: hosting better adapted to the needs of your website reduces the costs for you.
- Future carbon regulations: in all likelihood there will be some form of surcharge or tax on carbon emissions in the coming time. Prepare now and don't react when it's too late.
- A USP: If your website or online service produces less carbon emissions and/or offsets them, you can communicate that. A growing number of visitors view this positively.
How to reduce website emissions#
Lower CO2 Emissions = Better User Experience#
As mentioned above, optimizing your website to emit as little carbon as possible often goes hand-in-hand with improving the user experience. That's good for you, because you're killing two birds with one stone. First things first:
A concrete plan provides clarity.
Based on the current data from inSites and the comparison with other sites, you can consider how many CO2 emissions could be saved on your website.
Look at individual sections and components of your website and consider: Does this part of the site benefit your visitors? "If in doubt, leave it out!" (example: the very reduced google.com frontpage) - Minimalism has many advantages, especially for your visitors. It makes it clearer to them what the purpose of your website is. In addition, you can also see from your statistics which pages are frequently clicked and which are very rarely. Sort out here calmly, or summarize.
Look at the "User Journey" of your website. How many clicks (new page loads or views) do visitors need to get to their desired destination? Can the number be reduced? Example: A furniture website that already contains all furniture categories and their subcategories in its navigation leads the user very quickly to the desired subcategory → only one click, not two or even more. This not only saves on data transfer, but also leads to more satisfied visitors.
Good navigation is key: it also avoids "yoyo browsing", i.e. a user clicks, then realizes they are not where they wanted to be, and would have to go back to the home page to find the right path on a website with poor navigation. If the navigation is better structured, he will reach his destination with fewer clicks.
Understand people, design for people#
Reduce text length: this does not save a lot of data, but it is the sum that counts. Avoid duplicate content and optimize your texts for human readability. No one likes to read lengthy texts and search engines also find this unattractive, as they try to imitate human behavior in order to display the best possible results.
By the way, it is not always a bad thing if your bounce rate is high. Maybe the visitor already found what he wanted by visiting a single page? It's best to check more closely why visitors bounce on a page, i.e. leave it again without further clicks.
Optimize images and videos#
Proper handling of images can save large amounts of data.
- It's best to use the WEBP format for photography, because on average it allows 30% smaller file sizes than JPEG. More information and tools can be found here: https://webponize.org, https://www.gimp.org
- Keep an eye on the AVIF format for images, it is even more efficient (about half the size of WEBP), but is not yet universally supported.
- PNG and GIF are more efficient for simple graphics and illustrations with only a few colors and gradients.
- For video files, the MP4 format is more efficient than GIF and also provides better usability features such as easy integration of subtitles or a description of the video content.
- Think about the pixel dimensions in which your image files are needed. Will they be used as small preview graphics (thumbnails), or as large background images? Think about responsiveness: different device sizes require different dimensions of the files. With HTML attributes like srcset and sizes you can tell the browser which image version to load and use in which device. This way, only the necessary dimension versions of the files are loaded.
- Finally, for image files, use compression tools like Shortpixel, TinyPNG, and ImageOptim, which reduce file sizes using clever algorithms without visible loss of quality.
- Photos usually have an important central focus point. The rest around it can be blurry without people considering it a visual disadvantage or even noticing it. Blurred areas of a photo save an unexpectedly large amount of file size.
- Vector-based file formats like SVG work very well for icons or logos and have an extremely small file size. They can also be integrated directly into your website's HTML code, saving additional server requests.
- Darker designs are not only easier on the eyes, but also use less energy from the LEDs and OLEDs in screens. This also saves battery life on end devices! Example: Google Maps uses 63% less energy on average in night mode.
- Colors also play a role: to display blue color, the LEDs and OLEDs in the devices require up to 25% more energy than for red and green hues. Black requires the least amount.
- Videos and animations can make a website more interesting, but they consume a lot of memory, energy and therefore battery power. So evaluate video content by the yardstick of whether it really adds significant value to the visitor. Tools like "Lottie," a service from Airbnb, can make big file size savings here.
- Avoid auto playing videos: only when a visitor really wants to watch a video should it load.
- Every second of a video takes more storage and therefore energy than a single JPEG image. So make your videos shorter and, if possible, replace them with images. Keep in mind the user and the content you want to convey.
- As cool as GIFs are, they are among the most inefficient video files around. If possible, try to convert them to WEBP format, which is widely supported by current browsers.
- Fonts: custom fonts is a very popular way to make websites more attractive, but they generate additional requests and therefore higher page weight (total file size of the website). This increases loading times and energy consumption. Therefore, the most efficient choice are the pre-installed fonts, such as Arial, Times New Roman, Helvetica and Roboto (Android). If external fonts are unavoidable, check if you can do without certain weights: maybe "normal" and "bold" are enough for you, and you can do without "thin" and "semi-bold", etc. If possible, use Variable Fonts, which can automatically display all weights from just one cut.
- One method for doing this is caching. For this, you can use plugins like "WP Rocket" for WordPress.
- Avoid tracking scripts. You're already on the right track with inSites, because most others consume a lot more resources. The inSites tracking script needs just 0.2 kilobytes, whereas Google's Tag Manager needs 28 kB, Google Analytics 17 kB or Matomo/Piwik 22 kB.
- Fonts, if desired for the design, can be optimized: for example, convert them from TTF format to the more efficient WOFF2 format. With the Webfont generator from Font Squirrel you can make even more precise improvements to your fonts: do you need support for all languages and their special characters in the font? If you save only a part (= subset) of the font you really use in the website, you can significantly reduce the file size in a few minutes.
- Block bots: It is estimated that about half of the world's Internet traffic is caused by bots. Some are necessary to keep search indexes up to date, for example, but many bots cause unnecessary server load without providing any benefits. Bots can be blocked by firewalls that some hosting services offer. Contact your hosting provider for that.
- Very few websites could be hosted on a RaspberryPI at home - even though that would probably be the most efficient method. However, it doesn't always have to be your own big server in the data center. Try to find the hosting solution that is optimally adapted to the resource consumption of your website. The easiest way to do this is via "shared hosting", i.e. the use of a server by several websites that share it. This way, fewer available resources remain unused.
- CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) mostly distribute static files of a website on different servers and are therefore geographically closer to visitors, which reduces the megabyte miles (the physical distance that the data travels between the web server and the visitor, for example) and shortens loading times. However, CDNs have unfortunately rarely been optimized for sustainability so far, so you have to be careful about which provider you choose.
- An increasing number of hosting providers are powered by 100% green electricity. Pay attention to this when making your choice. Also check in which way your hosting provider can offer "100% green power": does it own energy power plants such as solar panels or wind turbines? Does it invest in them? Does it use "dirty" energy but pay for offsetting the carbon emissions? A hosting provider that produces its own electricity in a sustainable way is preferable.
Conclusion: As you can see, for just about any website in the world, there are many different ways to optimize it for efficiency and thus usability and sustainability. Often, even a few "quick fixes" are enough to quickly achieve a big advantage without having to invest a particularly large amount of money and working time. Now it's up to you!
For more information and studies on many of the topics addressed, we recommend reading the book "Sustainable Web Design" by Tom Greenwood, on which much of these tips are based.
Average transfer size
Status January 2021: Desktop: 2,063 kB, Mobile: 1,900 kB